Mueller Refuses to Discuss Discredited “Dossier” or Probe Origins

Mueller Refuses to Discuss Discredited “Dossier” or Probe Origins

Robert Mueller made it clear in his opening statement he would not discuss the discredited “dossier” or the origin of the Russia Probe.

Kimberley Strassel

@KimStrassel

Well, that is convenient. The two big areas that Mueller puts off-limit up front are the only ones that actually matter—the actions of FBI in 2016/early 2017, and Steele dossier.

1,688 people are talking about this

From FoxNews

Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller said Wednesday that he would not discuss any information regarding the origins of the Russia investigation—including questions about the bureau’s initial probe and the now-infamous anti-Trump dossier—during his highly anticipated hearing on Capitol Hill.

During his opening statement before the House Judiciary Committee, Mueller again expressed his reluctance as an appointed prosecutor to testify before Congress and warned that he would not answer certain questions.

“It is unusual for a prosecutor to testify about a criminal investigation and given my role as a prosecutor there are reasons why my testimony will be limited,” Mueller said Wednesday, noting that his public testimony could influence “ongoing matters.”

“I am unable to answer questions about the FBI’s initial opening of the counterintelligence investigation,” Mueller continued, adding he would be unable to answer questions on “matters relating to the Steele dossier.”

“Those matters are subject to review and any questions on that should be directed to the FBI or the Department of Justice,” Mueller said,  referring in part to the dossier compiled by Christopher Steele.

His comments came within minutes of being sworn in as a witness, in an apparent attempt to tamp down Republican lawmakers’ questions on the matters.

Republicans on both committees planned to focus their questions on the origins of the Russia investigation—including questions on Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants against the Trump campaign in 2016, the unverified anti-Trump dossier, and evidence of political bias from special counsel team members like former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

One Republican source told Fox News Tuesday that they expected Mueller “to try to get out of answering a lot of those questions,” and claimed they are “outside the bounds” of his report—specifically on the issue of how the FBI could have used the dossier to obtain FISA warrants. The source said he may also say that “those questions are subject to ongoing investigation.”

The Justice Department told Mueller that his testimony “must remain within the boundaries” of the public, redacted version of his report, according to a letter obtained by Fox News.

“We’re not expecting him to be forthcoming with answers on that stuff, one way or another,” the source told Fox News on Tuesday.

At the White House, President Trump has attempted to discredit Mueller by calling him “highly conflicted,” suggesting he should not be given the chance to testify.

“Highly conflicted Robert Mueller should not be given another bite at the apple. In the end it will be bad for him and the phony Democrats in Congress who have done nothing but waste time on this ridiculous Witch Hunt,” Trump tweeted Monday. “Result of the Mueller Report, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION.”

Source: theconservativeopinion

See more here: conservatives

Loading...

loading...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *